Complaints Submitted to OPO, January 2024

CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0003
Date of Complaint: 1/2/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: He and his service dog were walking into HEB when a customer began
yelling at them threatening them and trying to get him to go outside. The two officers working at
HEB came over and started telling the complainant to get out of the store. One of the officers
pushed a shopping cart into him and he pushed it back into the officer. The officer kept telling
him to get out of the store. Finally, he started to leave. The officer did not want to hear what
happened and just kept telling him to leave. He could not get the paperwork to sue HEB. He told
the officers to arrest him, and the officers said they would not arrest him but if he did not get off
the property, they would mace him and his service dog, which is illegal. Cops are garbage. He
cursed them out and called them every racist thing in the damn book. They are all racist and the
police officers were acting like animals not professional. They did not come over and ask what
the problem was and ask them to go outside they just came over and said get the hell out of here.
What are you doing hiring psychopaths?
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTT OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0009
Date of Complaint: 1/3/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Harassment
Austin Police Officers Involved: Unknown:
X
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: He has had an ongoing situation with APD sitting in front of his house
in unmarked cars, and they are also sending drones over his home. He does not have a lot of
traffic coming to his house, only his friends and they have been coming around for years. He has a
bad history with APD, and it makes him nervous. He is on medication, and he does not know if
APD is going to shoot him, kill him, or what. It makes him very uncomfortable in his own home.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0010
Date of Complaint: 1/3/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved: Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: The first police officer who came out on the 29th recommended she call
a locksmith and have her locks changed. She changed her locks, but her receipt disappeared from
her bedroom. They just go shopping in her apartment. They have a key. She told the officer that
she was sick of these people and the officer questioned if she was feeling anxious, overwhelmed,
or depressed. She had twelve tumblers in her cabinet and now there are only two. If the police
would come out, they would see what is happening. It is an ongoing nightmare. She testified
before the Austin Mayor and Council, and it is still going on. The chief gave her phone number,
but she never called. She is a survivor of serval illnesses and is being robbed. She does not
understand how the police can say they protect and serve. APD never comes out and questions
anyone and no one cares. The police asked her if she felt like she was going to blow a top. She
told the officer she was doing all she could not to become a victim and start being a person who
goes downstairs with her baseball bat or her mop handle and clean house because she is sick of
these people. The officer told her to call 311 if she felt like she was going to lose it. APD is
allowing her to be victimized and if she feels like she is going to retaliate, call 311, and then APD
will come out and take her to the nut house or whatever they do. What about prevention? The
officers that came to her apartment were very nice. She does not understand how the city can
allow this type of victimization on city-owned property. She does not understand how anyone
can allow a 74-year-old person to be consistently victimized. Things are disappearing out of her
bedroom. There have been over 58 complaints out of the apartments where she lives.
Medications have been stolen and people are being victimized. She buys food and puts it in the
freezer and when she gets back from church it is gone. What is she supposed to do about people
stealing from her?
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0013
Date of Complaint: 1/4/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved: Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: He was evicted from his apartment well under 90 days and his very
expensive shaving kit is missing and he cannot find a replica of it anywhere. It was a very
traumatic event. The police showed up with shields and a ram for his door even though he had
not committed any crime or hurt anyone. The shaving kit that he collected over time is gone. He
would like to have his shaving kit back. The only crime he committed was that he was not able to
pay his rent and it is not fair for people to take his things. The shaving kit was an heirloom gift
from his belated mother. When he got out of the clinic, he could not find it in the boxes that they
took out of his apartment when he was being evicted so he tried to re-purchase the same shaving
kit but could not find it at any stores. He does not know what to do and it is a very frustrating
situation.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0014
Date of Complaint: 1/4/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved: Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: An APD officer had his lights on but turned them off when he went
through the red light. The officer went into his neighborhood, so he followed him because it was
weird, he did not have his lights on and was not driving fast so it did not seem like a big situation
that was occurring. He followed the officer around the neighborhood. The officer went back out
to the main road heading to 1431. He thinks the officer knew he was following him. The officer
headed back to the main road and turned into a QT gas station and circled the gas station. The
complainant followed the officer and rolled down his window and asked the officer to stop. He
asked the officer why he turned his lights on to run the red light and then turned his lights off.
The complainant believes the officer responded, "I don't have to answer your questions" and got
confrontational. The officer was on duty because he had his gun on him but was in plain clothes,
maybe a detective at lunch or something. The officer got out of his car and started taking pictures
of the complainant's car. The complainant does not know if it was a work phone or the officer's
personal phone. The complainant has an issue with that. The biggest issue is what the officer did
and how he handled the confrontation, and it was not right for him to do that. He called Round
Rock and found out the officer was APD. The officer should not have been doing anything that he
did in the Round Rock Area. He wants to know who the officer was.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0015
Date of Complaint: 1/4/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved: Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant called the police right after midnight because her boyfriend's ex was causing a
big scene, pounding on the door and destroying property outside. The officer arrived and parked
right next to the ex, who was sitting in her car. The officer flashed his light in her car but did not
talk to her or anything. The officer came up to the door to speak with the complainant, and while
he was there, the ex drove away. The ex was drunk and had a
year-old in the car. The officer said
he would let nearby units know and give a description of the vehicle. The officer left and didn't
seem concerned even though the complainant was stressing that there was a child in the car.
Once the officer left, the ex came back, smashed the complainant's windshield, and drove off. She
called the officer back, but another officer showed up and said they couldn't do anything since the
ex was no longer there.
After the incident, the complainant asked the police to do a welfare check on the child and asked
for updates. She gave them all of her contact information and no one called them back with any
updates. When she called them back the next day, they said there was no report at all. They had
the wrong address. After a search, they finally found a report and let the complainant know there
was contact made, but no information about the welfare of the child was shared.
The complainant is not sure if this was TSCO or APD, or a combination of both departments.
The complainant provided a case number for the harassment report: 23-3590051
Officer Description:
Bald, older white male, heavy set; she thinks he had glasses on
The second officer to show up was a Sheriff's Deputy, but it is unclear if the first person was TSCO
or APD
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0016
Date of Complaint: 1/5/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved: Unknown:
X
Complaint:
The complainant called the police to do a welfare check for her elderly aunt,
, after
receiving pictures of injuries from
"s acquaintance.
The police called her back and let her know that they knocked on the door, and no one answered.
The complainant states that the officers on the earlier shift were supposed to do the welfare
check and believes it was negligent of them to wait that long. Multiple family members have
called and reported elderly abuse and the police have seen the injuries, know about the elderly
abuse and are not doing anything to help her aunt.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0017
Date of Complaint: 1/5/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved: Unknown:
X
Complaint:
The complainant's adult daughter was pickpocketed in downtown Austin at a club called the Beez
Kneez. Later that night, the thieves tried to use a credit card at CVS in Round Rock. The CVS has
footage of the thieves but cannot release it unless APD gets it.
The financial crimes unit has not been responsive to the complainant's case #23-9017949
She heard from a friend who knows people in APD that her case has been suspended. She doesn't
understand why it has been suspended, why she hasn't been contacted, and why they aren't doing
their jobs.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
Gray
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0019
Date of Complaint: 1/5/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
X
Complaint:
The complainant was woken up to officers banging on her door and flashlights shining into her
living room. There were more than 5 police officers outside. She opened the door; then the
officers told her they got an alarm about an electrical panel being opened. Once she said she was
fine, they left.
She went to her apartment manager and contacted the courtesy officer and her neighbors; no one
knows what that was about. The apartment manager told her there was nothing wrong with her
electricity and that the police wouldn't have been the ones to respond to that. The complainant
wants to know why they were there. She was traumatized. She has videos of this which she will
send to OPO via email.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0021
Date of Complaint: 1/8/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: She realizes there is a shortage of traffic police. She travels on Mopac
quite a bit and since there have not been police hanging out in the hot spots, she is having to drive
80mph to keep up with the flow of traffic. She has been in three or four near misses where
people get upset with each other and try to drive around one another very quickly. With school
being out everyone is just flying on the road, and it feels extremely dangerous and anxiety-
provoking. She has heard the same from her adult children who are on the road quite a bit. She
has been seeing a lot more accidents and having to sit for hours in traffic because there is
probably an investigation because the accidents are fatal. Her biggest complaint is not seeing or
observing APD on the road. There was an incident where an APD officer driving next to her, not
chasing anyone and he started going 80-85mph in and out of traffic and she felt it was just all
over at that point. She appreciates APD officers, and it would just be nice if there were more
police officers on the road.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0023
Date of Complaint: 1/9/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
X
Complaint:
Every Sunday there is a loud party that takes place at the address of:
Caller
stated that this has been an ongoing issue, that they're stating has still not been addressed. This
usually goes on from 8PM-5AM. This causes a noise disturbance all night. They have previous
service requests they entered, but they're saying this has never been responded by officers or
resolved. They also contacted their district reps. office, which is the Adam unit, and they haven't
heard back from them yet. Their latest service request # is: 24-00007701
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0024
Date of Complaint: 1/9/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Excessive Force
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
X
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
The above-named youth reported during a mental health assessment conducted by Psychology
Predoctoral Intern
(supervisor
Psy.D) that upon her arrest on
12/28/2023, "the police[officer] ran full speed at me and tackled me to the ground, [and I] lost
consciousness."
Ms.
stated that she also did not receive medical treatment. She stated she lost
consciousness for approximately 10 minutes. This document has been completed by
, M.A.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0025
Date of Complaint: 1/9/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: She has been trying to talk with APD for over two and a half years
about stalking and harassment from her ex. She is always told to call 311. She has not been able
to call 311 because her ex is blocking her calls. Whenever she gets a call from APD her ex blocks
the calls. She told APD that she cannot make the report over the phone because her ex was
blocking her phone, so she has to make the report in person. APD does not want her to make her
report in person. She knows it is a policy, but there has to be an exception. Something has to be
done.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
6581
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0028
Date of Complaint: 1/10/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
X
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: The incident happened almost a year ago. No one has gotten back to
her with an update. Every time she calls it goes straight to voice mail and no one ever returns her
call. No one has called to give her an update. She needs to file a suit against the person who
damaged her property, but she does not have the information she needs. She is sure the person
investigating the case has the information she needs to file the lawsuit. The person investigating
her case is impossible to get in touch with. She wants the investigator in her case to be changed
to someone who is reliable and responsible and that she can reach. It has been almost a year.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTL OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0034
Date of Complaint: 1/16/2024
Complainant's Name (if given): Anonymous
X
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
X
Complaint:
One of your unmarked cars hit a homeless man's dog on 183 access road license plate #
PWB0811 and just kept driving. I even slowed down and saw him speed up. He didn't even get
out to check the dog, which is illegal. When he noticed I saw he acted like he didn't see it but if I
could see the dog he could also. Is this the way your officers disregard life of an animal imagine
his disregard for humans.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTL OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0037
Date of Complaint: 1/16/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
My name is
. My family was abducted and murdered sometime with blood gang
and police impersonators. They had me taking to jail for reporting my family and kids missing 6
times in 2 different counties. They even turned some of my folks against me by feeding them lies
to target me and more people. They had my mom compromise my cell phone account at Walmart
with my stolen ID and my online Internet completely went bogus in order to keep me from
reporting them to actual law enforcement. They had both the gang members in uniform and also
deputy and FBI impersonators to proceed with kidnapping and robbing.y folks. After the last time
I went to jail both my attorneys were abducted murdered. My mom was drugged and beaten by
every day and even out in public. She did nothing but lie to me and threatened to
evict me or send me back to jail. About a week ago I found out that a old friend of mine was acting
strange after I had a conversation with him at the specs on airport and 2222. I was walking home
and noticed he walked down into the creek bed for some strange reason. I don"t wanna make any
assumptions but I just recently heard that"s where my friend daughter body was dumped.
Between December 15 the 2023 and January 10, 2024 The suspects had my mom sent to Seton
medical center and claim she had COVID. They drugged and abused her a whole week and 2 days
why I stayed home and noticed maintenance man and other blood gang members pushing what
appeared to be body bags to the 2 and floor dumpster. I even heard they burned a few body"s
there
They also had my family and kids locked up in the storage rooms in the parking garage. And
231,227,329
They been drugging and trafficking my family and kids also at the mental on airport. They also
had police impersonators show up at the Austin Commons to have give me a criminal trespassing
afterwards I walk to the 711 store on slaughter and 35 where they set up my mom with my
manger and had my missing
yr old daughter having
with my supervisor along with my
neice
and
.
I did report to the better business bureau. They were parked at
the gas station and snuck my family in the back to have sex Also kick butt coffee on airport and
2222 on 10/31/2023 i delt with the same issue even during in the middle of being shot.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0002
Date of Complaint: 1/2/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Michael Rauert 4678
Complaint:
APD did nothing when a man entered the complainant's home illegally. The landlord gave the
man a key, but that doesn't circumvent the complainant's rights. The man entered the
complainant's house, dismantled the alarm system, unplugged all of the complainant's cameras
and equipment, disabled the internet to the security system, and then piled everything on the
floor.
The man then tried to flee the scene through his neighbor's yard, and the police did nothing. The
complainant asked to speak to a supervisor, and the officer on the scene told him that he was the
supervisor.
Report number 24-0010717 Officer badge number #4678
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Formal Complaint
FOUNDED
6339
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0004
Date of Complaint: 1/2/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved: Nance, Rylee AP8578
Unknown:
X
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: She was in a car accident and the other person driving refused to
provide her insurance information. The other driver tried to leave and offered her cash. They
went back and forth, and the person kept trying to leave. The complainant called her friend, and
the friend blocked the other driver in so they could not leave. They called the police, explained
the situation, and were told there would be an officer there soon. They waited over 30 minutes
and there was no response from APD. They called again and waited over an hour and still got no
response. The other driver became frustrated and angry because they wanted to leave. The
complainant told them if they provided their insurance information, they could leave otherwise
they would have to wait for the police to show up. They called APD again and waited but still no
response. The other driver finally provided their insurance information after they waited over 2
hours and APD never showed up
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6339
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0005
Date of Complaint: 1/2/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Linsalata, Philip AP3004
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant was at Auditorium Shores when he had an interaction with an Austin Police
Officer. He asked for the badge number and name of the officer. The officer did not provide that
information, and the complainant stated that by law, he is required to provide that information,
and the officer broke the law and needs to be charged for that.
The complainant described the officer as a balding white-looking male with blue/green eyes,
approx. 150-170 lbs. The complainant wants to be updated and requests a call back with the
outcome of his complaint.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP CITY OF OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0012
Date of Complaint: 1/4/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved: Joseph Spees AP7796 Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant was arrested. The police officer who arrested her refused to identify herself and
told the complainant she didn't have to identify herself. Once the complainant got to the jail, she
was mistreated during booking. She has a bruise and a scar on her arm, along with bruising and
scarring on her neck from E choked.
TIN
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTINY
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0022
Date of Complaint: 1/8/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Excessive Force
Austin Police Officers Involved: Smart AP8674
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: Her boyfriend was arrested and upon his arrest, he was assaulted by
Officer Smart. Once he was taken to the police department, he had to receive stitches to his head,
he had a black eye, and multiple contusions to his back. There were several witnesses. After the
assault, the other officers on the scene discussed it and laughed and joked about it and said they
would have done the same thing. She does not have information for the other officers, but she is
sure they all had their body cams on.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6339
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CITY OF CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
1939
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0026
Date of Complaint: 1/9/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Shows AP5971
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
Sometime between January and March of 2023 in Colorado, APD officer Brock J Shows called her
employer to do a welfare check on her, which resulted in her losing her job and not being able to
find another job; she E that he is involved in a sex trafficking ring.
TIN
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Formal Complaint
FOUNDED
6339
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0027
Date of Complaint: 1/10/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved: Delgado AP3843
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: He was assaulted and APD dropped the ball. The person who
assaulted him is well known and APD knows him. APD still has not brought the person in so he
can identify him and file charges. Detective Julian Delgado III, #3843, region 3 property crime
investigator, disrespected him and did not follow up and bring this person to justice. Detective
Delgado asked for his evidence, so he uploaded videos showing the assault from start to finish
and he has confirmation of the upload. He was told a BOLO was put out. He has seen the
individual every single day since the incident. There has been no communication to him that the
person has been identified so he can come in and identify him and file the charges. The detective
stopped communicating with him. He followed up and no one got back to him. The detective told
him he would get back to him in 14 days, but he never did. Nothing has been done and he is still a
victim of a crime. The investigator has all of the information related to the case. He will be filing
charges against other officers for other incidents. He wants to be a part of the solution and not
the problem.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0030
Date of Complaint: 1/11/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Floyd AP8115
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: She is of sound mind and body. She used to work for the Department of
Defense and used to run law offices. She is at a rehab center and has been getting death. The
phone rings once and hangs up and disappears from her phone. She got a call yesterday and the
person told her she was going to hell. She thinks the calls are coming from the inside. One of the
officers that came out pretty much called her a liar and told her the calls never happened. The
officer gave her the ID number 240110240. She told that officer about something that happened
with a case worker and the officer told her "That does not happen". She wants it noted that this
was not good. An officer named Bryan who came out the day before was the complete opposite
and was fantastic. He stayed for three hours and told her that no one would get in without going
through him.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6339
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0031
Date of Complaint: 1/11/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Yarger AP6499 Unknown:
Complaint:
On Saturday night at Trinity street south of 6th st, about 230 am Sgt Yarger again put a spotlight
on me from his SUV while I was filming him. This is known as flaring or ghost flaring a camera
lens and is considered a violation of the 1st amendment to the Constitution of Texas and the
U.S.A. Constitution as well. And a clear retaliation and deprivation of rights under Turner V Driver
and other Federal Case law.
It is also a violation under section 302 of the APD Policy. As well as other parts of the police
policy, general orders, and the Oath that this officer took.
He is continually allowed to do criminal acts against me and others by the police department and
has a long history of abusing the public and committing heinous crimes under color of law.
To date the City/OPO/IA/SUI/APD have not reassigned him to a desk, have not investigated or
disciplined this bad cop. And that is causing unrest on the streets. This officer and others are
starting micro riots and civil disobedience through their criminally abusive acts against both
members of the Press and members of the Public realm. When police are allowed to commit
crimes, what would you expect but the people to react to your lack of oversight? This is your fault.
You are paid and charged with police oversight, and you do nothing.
If you fail to do your duty to discipline and fire and charge bad cops like Sgt. Yarger, the resulting
unrest will be on your hands due to your malfeasance under law. You won"t be able to blame
anyone but yourselves.
We are watching this unfold every day. And we have been filing complaints that go un-answered
for years. No email received with confirmation and case numbers are sent by this office. Your
Director lies and says that they cannot give us our own information and data to track our
complaints. Yet your web site says that you track and store data.
The office of Police Oversight is a sham. So is APD"s internal affiars and SUI. Useless. You and they
both cover for bad cops, even murdering cops. We have heard the testimony already. We saw SIU
cover for
and help all the witness officers write lies in their sworn statements,
on record, under Oath. Perjury is also a felony. And we watched many of your officers perjure
themselves under Oath. Unacceptable criminal activity, a blue wall of silence.
The people of Austin deserve better than you have given. Expect to be held accountable on the
streets, when you cannot hold your officers to the law and their Oath. Remember you work for us.
Not for your own selfish needs to use force and lights to stop the Press from filming you.
We also demand that you release the list of complaints that I have filed immediately. As promised.
And as I have asked repeatedly for 2 years now.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CITY OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
1939
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CITY OF CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERL
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0032
Date of Complaint: 1/11/2024
Complainant's Name (if given): Anonymous
X
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved: Frierson AP4578 Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant had questions for an officer after being in a situation she'd never been in before
regarding a car getting towed. The officer gave her incorrect information about the tow company,
so the complainant went back to ask for the correct information. The officer then threatened to
arrest her if she didn't back off. She said she was just asking for information. It was alarming how
aggressive the officer was when she was only asking for information. The officer's badge number
is 4578.
C
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
FOUNDED
6339
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTINY
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
1939
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0036
Date of Complaint: 1/16/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Zamora AP5386 Unknown:
Complaint:
I work in Asset Protection in the Walmart at Anderson Lane. Today I made a call about a
shoplifter that was concealing over $100.00 of merchandise. The subject passed all points of sale
with the items. PD arrived at that moment and I went towards them to point out the subject in the
parking lot. The officer asked me what did the subject do and I told him. The exact thing he said
was "we are not going to chase him for $100.00". I did not get the officer name or number. The call
to 911 was made with my number
for a black subject wearing a black jacket.
EA
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6339
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0041
Date of Complaint: 1/16/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Johnson AP7804
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
On October 31st, 2022 at an unknown time I was detained downtown Austin. During this review
of arrest I explained the circumstances and nature of my defense 105.1 to understand the
purpose and scope from my account of the facts to known and unknown responding officers who
ambushed me Explaining to the reviewing officer #7804 of the initial witness negligence at the
door and he isn"t to be accounted for in his testimony through his dishonesty and observation of
not checking every patron entering the establishment but ensuring to #officer 7804 he did
officer #7804 proceeded to write a false report in writing and concealed my testimony as
"rambling" affidavit (D1DC22207194). In dishonesty officer #7804 violated multiple general
orders including 402.2.4 (b) (c) given to the Austin police department. Officer #7804 did not
place me in handcuffs nor did the officer #7804 frisk me, but wrote in the arrest affidavit he did.
Officer #7804 continued to distort facts in his arrest affidavit not telling the facts of the matter
being dishonest 900.4.3 (a) (b) (c) Four officers ambushed me, cuffed, frisked and removed my
weapon before I ever encountered officer #7804. one officer was a chubby, white, female officer
last name Collins in which she was present in a arrest earlier in the year where officers ambushed
me once before. Collins and unknown officers proceeded to detain and sat me in an unknown
squad car. Moments later initially encountering officer #7804 who initially violated general
orders specifically 105.2 sections (A) (B) (C). the officer #7804 did not show any respect or
consideration of the light in my testimony. I believe this resulted from the officers unknown and
officer Collins who ambushed me had a prejudice and motive of a previous arrest. In a event of
this involving a persons with a weapon officer #7804 and all officers who touched me should
have initiated their body worn camera per 303.3.1 (A) which is also in the general orders for the
Austin police Department to prove this matter of dishonesty and false report writing violating
900.3 (a1) (c) and 900.3.2 (b) (c) as all unknown and known officers who took apart of this
unjust and unlawful arrest. Committed multiple Austin police department general order
violations.
Officer Description:
White Male Stephen Johnson #7804
01/16/2024 01:38 PM
The complainant alleges *con't from OPO form:
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
on October 31st, 2022 at an unknown time initial witness on the police affidavit
was working at the entrance door of toulouse a private owned establishment downtown Austin. I
stood near the entrance for about 5-10 minutes. I observed
let individuals in the
establishment with no attempt of searching them. any cameras at the entrance or public safety
cameras will prove this fact. As the rain started to come down Lamont Lucas invited me into the
establishment. He began to search and frisk as I attempted to refuse the search he continued in a
hostile harassing frisking manner to say he can't "let that in". Being unaware of the 51% establish
to the side of the door hidden in the unknown of the establishment foresight. Out of the line I
continued to observe
continue to let patrons in the establishment with no search
continuing only frisking and searching people of dark color in the establishment. I then asked
what did those people have to be let in the club with no search or frisking. Do I
need to give you money ? it's my birthday? why are you discriminating & not being firm & fair
infringed and got the attention of about four officers who ambushed me from
behind as I stood to the side of the establishment
should not be in a position of
gate keeping safety protocols downtown in a matter of discrimination ands dishonesty. if to his
knowledge knew the establishment was 51%. That should be held for everyone entering to be
searched and frisked properly and those in the unknown Not I can't let that in" or "those my
people", but holding integrity for the safety and perseverance of all patrons lives entering the
establishment enforcing the establishment is 51% acknowledging the law and sign hidden in the
side of the establishment blind to patrons entering from the street not the side as myself. In
conclusion
was dishonest in his witness statement to officer #7804 and negligent
in a position of safety and preserving life.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTINY
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
1931
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0043
Date of Complaint: 1/16/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
La Barbera AP8923
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: On May 11, 2023 at an unknown time I was driving home. Promptly
getting lights activated behind me as I turned into
Approximately 844 feet from my
home address. Feeling profiled I didn"t feel safe to pull over. Pulling into my home parking lot
officer #8928 crept on the side of my vehicle with his hand on his weapon. Subsequently seeing I
was in full compliance with his fellow officer hostility and forceful commands. officer #8928 took
the information I gave officer #8923. As the investigation furthered officer # 8928 made
comments and concerns about drugs during this arrest. I explained to both officers of my
ownership of a business in travis county, being a future college student, and prior Florida
correctional officer. Officer #8928 still made unjustly, biased, unprofessional comments. Inquiring
of my vehicles I own and money in my truck. Once the investigation fathered in which officer
#8923 called upon a department of public safety k9 search. No drugs or illegal substances turned
out as a result. Officers did go through a backpack and found a assault rifle pistol legally
registered in my name. Officer #8928 seemingly got to pressing me about coming forth with
drugs and illegal substances coercing me to believe I would not get harsh treatment, "to just give
something up". I seemingly told officer #8928 I had nothing illegal or drugs on me. Officer #8928
can then be seen forcefully moving me to an unknown marked patrol car on video. Leading to
another search emptying my pockets out and taking my shoes off. I asserted my innocence and
testimony of light officer #8928 grossly continued to ask for drugs or something illegal "to give
him something". I continued to stand my ground of innocence officer #8928 continued to become
frustrated accusing me of evading, eluding, and swallowing drugs. Officer #8928 continued to
search my vehicle finding nothing and looking into another vehicle out of no reasonable doubt
that I owned in the parking that can be seen on video. In conclusion to me maintaining my plea of
innocence officer #8928 announced Miranda rights to me. On the basis of not having a "strap" or
" "holster" for my assault rifle pistol that was in my truck concealed in a back pack in resulting
unlawful carry charge on the affidavit (c1cr23204465). Writing in the report officer #8928 did
not disclose of what made the assault rifle pistol illegal. which makes me believe he knows of his
actions were unjust and unlawful many of the general orders set forth for the Austin police
department to follow officer #8928 violated. 402.2.4 (b) concealing the fact of why the rifle was
deemed unlawful. Grossly and bialy harassing me to come up with drugs violating 914.3.2 (A)
repeatedly through the arrest. I believe officer #8928 retaliated against me and my property due
to a failed drug pursuit seemingly violating 914.3.4., as a result of me short coming with a drug or
illegal substance he verbalized The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American
Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
upon request. forcefully and unlawfully requested. Officer #8928 once again violated general
orders with repeated poor evaluations 900.4.3 I pleaded I have no drugs or illegal substances on
me I am a business owner in the Austin community. he still insisted to neglect proper duty and
care. officer #8928 violated 900.3.1 (c) concealing the true situation of the unlawful carry charge
with no basis of the charge to influence the thwart of criminal investigation as there was zero. I
was not under any circumstance deemed to be incompetent to carry nor am I a convicted felon. I
have my second amendment right. officer #8928 illy and grossly violated 900.3.2 bringing
discredit to the department actively taking property he had no business seizing in circumstances
Americans and citizens of Texas take pride in.. to falsely accuse charges of unlawful carry. officer
#8928 in totality left a shock through out my mind and soul. On May 11, 2023 at an unknown
time I was driving home. Promptly getting lights activated behind me as I turned into
Feeling profiled I didn't feel safe to pull over.
Pulling into my home parking lot officer #8928 crept on the side of my vehicle with his hand on
his weapon. Subsequently seeing I was in full com
his fellow officer hostility and
forceful commands. officer #8928 took the information I gave officer #8923. As the investigation
furthered officer # 8928 made comments and concerns about drugs during this arrest. I
explained to both officers of my ownership of a business in travis county, being a future college
student, and prior Florida correctional officer. Officer #8928 still made unjustly, biased,
unprofessional comments. Inquiring of my vehicles I own and money in my truck. Once the
investigation fathered in which officer #8923 called upon a department of public safety k9
search. No drugs or illegal substances turned out as a result. Officers did go through a backpack
and found a assault rifle pistol legally registered in my name. Officer #8928 seemingly got to
pressing me about coming forth with drugs and illegal substances coercing me to believe I would
not get harsh treatment, "to just give something up". I seemingly told officer #8928 I had nothing
illegal or drugs on me. Officer #8928 can then be seen forcefully moving me to an unknown
marked patrol car on video. Leading to another search emptying my pockets out and taking my
shoes off. I asserted my innocence and testimony of light officer #8928 grossly continued to ask
for drugs or something illegal "to give him something". I continued to stand my ground of
innocence officer #8928 continued to become frustrated accusing me of evading, eluding, and
swallowing drugs. Officer #8928 continued to search my vehicle finding nothing and looking into
another vehicle out of no reasonable doubt that I owned in the parking that can be seen on video.
In conclusion to me maintaining my plea of innocence officer #8928 announced Miranda rights to
me. On the basis of not having a "strap" or "holster" for my assault rifle pistol that was in my
truck concealed in a back pack in resulting unlawful carry charge on the affidavit
(c1cr23204465). Writing in the report officer #8928 did not disclose of what made the assault
rifle pistol illegal. which makes me believe he knows of his actions were unjust and unlawful
many of the general orders set forth for the Austin police department to follow officer #8928
violated. 402.2.4 (b) concealing the fact of why the rifle was deemed unlawful. Grossly and bialy
harassing me to come up with drugs violating 914.3.2 (A) repeatedly through the arrest. I believe
officer #8928 retaliated against me and my property due to a failed drug pursuit seemingly
violating 914.3.4., as a result of me short coming with a drug or illegal substance he verbalized
forcefully and unlawfully requested. Officer #8928 once again violated general orders with
repeated poor evaluations 900.4.3 I pleaded I have no drugs or illegal substances on me I am a
business owner in the Austin community. he still insisted to neglect proper duty and care. officer
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTL OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. #8928 violated
900.3.1 (c) concealing the true situation of the unlawful carry charge with no basis of the charge
to influence the thwart of criminal investigation as there was zero. I was not under any
circumstance deemed to be incompetent to carry nor am I a convicted felon. I have my second
amendment right. officer #8928 illy and grossly violated 900.3.2 bringing discredit to the
department actively taking property he had no business seizing in circumstances Americans and
citizens of Texas take pride in.. to falsely accuse charges of unlawful carry. officer #8928 in
totality left a shock through out my mind and soul. violating general orders 105.2 (a) (b) (c)
having such poor community policing skills using tactics of bribery, coercing, and manipulation.
investigating with no dignity nor respect for a hardworking youth minority. having to maintain
innocence and still having no voice throughout this encounter unless I was deemed to have drugs
or something" to giv
D sense of purpose and scope for the hard work I
expressed to him I do in the community. depriving me of any mutual respect, fair policing, culture
acceptance, and overall trust in policing. officer #8928
SS to want drugs and illegal
substances violated general orders 301.2 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) having to experience officer #8928
oppress my rights, showed obvious prejudice, use gestures that I was not being honest of my
craft as a barber, shamed and belittled me having no courtesy with a impartial attitude for sure.
During the event I do believe officer #8928 violated general orders 303.3.1 (a). seeing officer
#8928 hand on his pistol on the video creeping to my passenger unaware until I watched the
video showed his eagerness to protect his life, but not follow general orders. #officer #8928 has
far most been the most biased, unruly, and prejudice officer I have encountered in Austin. Officer
#8928 violated many orders his dishonesty and plaguing of the constitution should not be
tolerated further.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Formal Complaint
FOUNDED
6830
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0043
Date of Complaint: 1/16/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Marr AP8928, La Barbera AP8923
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
On May 11, 2023 at an unknown time I was driving home. Promptly getting lights activated
behind me as I turned into
from my home address. Feeling
profiled I didn"t feel safe to pull over. Pulling into my home parking lot officer #8928 crept on the
side of my vehicle with his hand on his weapon. Subsequently seeing I was in full compliance with
his fellow officer hostility and forceful commands. officer #8928 took the information I gave
officer #8923. As the investigation furthered officer # 8928 made comments and concerns about
drugs during this arrest. I explained to both officers of my ownership of a business in travis
county, being a future college student, and prior Florida correctional officer. Officer #8928 still
made unjustly, biased, unprofessional comments. Inquiring of my vehicles I own and money in my
truck. Once the investigation fathered in which officer #8923 called upon a department of public
safety k9 search. No drugs or illegal substances turned out as a result. Officers did go through a
backpack and found a assault rifle pistol legally registered in my name. Officer #8928 seemingly
got to pressing me about coming forth with drugs and illegal substances coercing me to believe I
would not get harsh treatment, "to just give something up". I seemingly told officer #8928 I had
nothing illegal or drugs on me. Officer #8928 can then be seen forcefully moving me to an
unknown marked patrol car on video. Leading to another search emptying my pockets out and
taking my shoes off. I asserted my innocence and testimony of light officer #8928 grossly
continued to ask for drugs or something illegal "to give him something". I continued to stand my
ground of innocence officer #8928 continued to become frustrated accusing me of evading,
eluding, and swallowing drugs. Officer #8928 continued to search my vehicle finding nothing and
looking into another vehicle out of no reasonable doubt that I owned in the parking that can be
seen on video. In conclusion to me maintaining my plea of innocence officer #8928 announced
Miranda rights to me. On the basis of not having a "strap" or "holster" for my assault rifle pistol
that was in my truck concealed in a back pack in resulting unlawful carry charge on the affidavit
(c1cr23204465). Writing in the report officer #8928 did not disclose of what made the assault
rifle pistol illegal. which makes me believe he knows of his actions were unjust and unlawful
many of the general orders set forth for the Austin police department to follow officer #8928
violated. 402.2.4 (b) concealing the fact of why the rifle was deemed unlawful. Grossly and bialy
harassing me to come up with drugs violating 914.3.2 (A) repeatedly through the arrest. I believe
officer #8928 retaliated against me and my property due to a failed drug pursuit seemingly
violating 914.3.4., as a result of me short coming with a drug or illegal substance he verbalized
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
forcefully and unlawfully requested. Officer #8928 once again violated general orders with
repeated poor evaluations 900.4.3. I pleaded I have no drugs or illegal substances on me I am a
business owner in the Austin community. he still insisted to neglect proper duty and care. officer
#8928 violated 900.3.1 (c) concealing the true situation of the unlawful carry charge with no
basis of the charge to influence the thwart of criminal investigation as there was zero. I was not
under any circumstance deemed to be incompetent to carry nor am I a convicted felon. I have my
second amendment right. officer #8928 illy and grossly violated 900.3.2 bringing discredit to the
department actively taking property he had no business seizing in circumstances Americans and
citizens of Texas take pride in.. to falsely accuse charges of unlawful carry. officer #8928 in
totality left a shock through out my mind and soul.
On May 11, 2023 at an unknown time I was driving home. Promptly getting lights activated
behind me as I turned into
from my home address. Feeling
profiled I didn't feel safe to pull over. Pulling into my home parking lot officer #8928 crept on the
side of my vehicle with his hand on his weapon. Subsequently seeing I was in full compliance with
his fellow officer hostility and #8928 took the information I gave
officer #8923. As the investigation furthered officer # 8928 made comments and concerns about
drugs during this arrest. I explained to both officers of my ownership of a business in travis
county, being a future college student, and prior Florida correctional officer. Officer #8928 still
made unjustly, biased, unprofessional comments. Inquiring of my vehicles I own and money in my
truck. Once the investigation fathered in which officer #8923 called upon a department of public
safety k9 search. No drugs or illegal substances turned out as a result. Officers did go through a
backpack and found a assault rifle pistol legally registered in my name. Officer #8928 seemingly
got to pressing me about coming forth with drugs and illegal substances coercing me to believe I
would not get harsh treatment, "to just give something up". I seemingly told officer #8928 I had
nothing illegal or drugs on me. Officer #8928 can then be seen forcefully moving me to an
unknown marked patrol car on video. Leading to another search emptying my pockets out and
taking my shoes off. I asserted my innocence and testimony of light officer #8928 grossly
continued to ask for drugs or something illegal "to give him something". I continued to stand my
ground of innocence officer #8928 continued to become frustrated accusing me of evading,
eluding, and swallowing drugs. Officer #8928 continued to search my vehicle finding nothing and
looking into another vehicle out of no reasonable doubt that I owned in the parking that can be
seen on video. In conclusion to me maintaining my plea of innocence officer #8928 announced
Miranda rights to me. On the basis of not having a "strap" or "holster" for my assault rifle pistol
that was in my truck concealed in a back pack in resulting unlawful carry charge on the affidavit
(c1cr23204465). Writing in the report officer #8928 did not disclose of what made the assault
rifle pistol illegal. which makes me believe he knows of his actions were unjust and unlawful
many of the general orders set forth for the Austin police department to follow officer #8928
violated. 402.2.4 (b) concealing the fact of why the rifle was deemed unlawful. Grossly and bialy
harassing me to come up with drugs violating 914.3.2 (A) repeatedly through the arrest. I believe
officer #8928 retaliated against me and my property due to a failed drug pursuit seemingly
violating 914.3.4., as a result of me short coming with a drug or illegal substance he verbalized
forcefully and unlawfully requested. Officer #8928 once again violated general orders with
repeated poor evaluations 900.4.3 I pleaded I have no drugs or illegal substances on me I am a
business owner in the Austin community. he still insisted to neglect proper duty and care. officer
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
#8928 violated 900.3.1 (c) concealing the true situation of the unlawful carry charge with no
basis of the charge to influence the thwart of criminal investigation as there was zero. I was not
under any circumstance deemed to be incompetent to carry nor am I a convicted felon. I have my
second amendment right. officer #8928 illy and grossly violated 900.3.2 bringing discredit to the
department actively taking property he had no business seizing in circumstances Americans and
citizens of Texas take pride in.. to falsely accuse charges of unlawful carry. officer #8928 in
totality left a shock through out my mind and soul. violating general orders 105.2 (a) (b) (c)
having such poor community policing skills using tactics of bribery, coercing, and manipulation.
investigating with no dignity nor respect for a hardworking youth minority. having to maintain
innocence and still having no voice throughout this encounter unless I was deemed to have drugs
or something" to give". officer #8928 showed no sense of purpose and scope for the hard work I
expressed to him I do in the community. depriving me of any mutual respect, fair policing, culture
acceptance, and overall tru
S to want drugs and illegal
substances violated general orders 301.2 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) having to experience officer #8928
oppress my rights, showed obvious prejudice, use gestures that I was not being honest of my
craft as a barber, shamed ar ith a impartial attitude for sure.
During the event I do believe officer #8928 violated general orders 303.3.1 (a). seeing officer
#8928 hand on his pistol on the video creeping to my passenger unaware until I watched the
video showed his eagerness to protect his life, but not follow general orders. #officer #8928 has
far most been the most biased, unruly, and prejudice officer I have encountered in Austin. Officer
#8928 violated many orders his dishonesty and plaguing of the constitution should not be
tolerated further.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Formal Complaint
FOUNDED
6839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0044
Date of Complaint: 1/16/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Sin AP5672
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
From email titled, "Case #233151368 assault case mishandled"
Hello, I currently have a black eye from being assaulted by two different people and was told
there was nothing that can be done about this because the people stated a different occurrence
than what actually happened. This does not make sense, since when do people who have
warrants and give someone a black eye not get arrested for assault? I searched up the Detective
on the case and was notified of his previous mismanagement on a domestic violence case that
ended with the victim getting shot. The FBI suggested reaching back out to internal affairs
regarding this new case.
this is regarding investigator "Ok Sinn" who handled a case where I was physically assaulted by
and when the investigator called me to discuss the situation, he laughed at
me when I stated I had a black eye after he said "there was no proof of an assault". Investigator Ok
Sinn called from a 311 number so I'm sure the call can be found in recordings.
Offense was over the phone on November 13, 2023 around 2-3 pm from Detective Ok Kyun Sin
#5672 from caller ID 311.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
NDED
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0046
Date of Complaint: 1/17/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved: Dale AP6633
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
I made contact with an individual that had a negative experience with an officer in a position of
superiority, F780 (Mark Dale). The individual called 911 to report her neighbors leaving their dog
outside in 17 degree weather. This was her 3rd call to 911 this evening because she did not feel as
if her concerns were initially addressed due to the dog still being outside for several more hours.
Corporal Dale contacted the complainant and began laughing at the complainant as she expressed
her concerns. It was stated by Corporal Dale, "Don"t you think it would be a waste of city
resources and money if officers responded to these type of calls?" Corporal Dale went onto to
continuously question the complainant and said this was her 3rd time calling and that it was a bit
"excessive." He proceeded to say that officers had previously responded "several" times earlier in
the day and that he didn"t feel the need to go by again and make contact.
Corporal Dale"s interaction with this complainant made her feel invalidated and hesitant to call
police in the future. After speaking with the complainant, she indicated that the 2 previous
officers were extremely helpful and understanding of her concerns, however, Corporal Dale came
across as disrespectful, belittling, and insincere.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
NDED
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTL OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0047
Date of Complaint: 1/17/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved: Rodriguez AP5667
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: His home was robbed. He called 311 when the incident happened and
filed a report indicating firearms and other items were stolen. He followed up with an e-mail
with the serial number for the firearms and video footage of the robbers. He was given a case
number #23-5031556. He has had no response from Detective Domingo Rodriguez who was
assigned to his case. He has called the detective's direct line over three times in the past three
weeks with no response to his voicemail. He is trying to file his insurance to get reimbursed for
the stolen items and move on. He hopes as a citizen there is a little more interest in catching the
people who are working the block.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0048
Date of Complaint: 1/17/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved: Judd AP8279
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
The complainant dropped his phone on the road and pulled over to pick it up. Before he could
even pick his phone up, a cop came and banged on his window and wrote him a ticket. The
complainant doesn't understand what happened or understand how this is a criminal case. The
officer drove off before the complainant could ask for a supervisor or ask any questions about the
ticket.
The officer came back 5 minutes later, and asked why the complainant was still parked illegally
and on his phone. The officer threatened to call a tow truck if the complainant didn't move.
The officers name was Judd badge #8279
Officer Judd approached the complainant twice within 5 minutes and proceeded to insult the
complainant and infer that he had no idea what was going on, even though the complainant was
very clearly asking him questions about his situation.
The officer got really close to the car and raised his voice. The officer took his ID and didn't ask
for insurance, gave the ID back in about 15 seconds and already had the ticket printed out. The
complainant had a panic attack and said he would likely go the hospital.
The officer was rude and there was no need for the officer to treat someone like that. The
complainant requests to be contacted with any updates about this complaint as soon as possible.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
1939
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0051
Date of Complaint: 1/19/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Cummiskey AP6964
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
The complainant was trying to sell her guitar downtown.
Officer Bridget Cummiskey #6964
confiscated the guitar that the complainant alleges was falsely reported stolen.
Report number: 2024-5001086
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0052
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Cordero AP9220, Hodges AP9074, Igoe
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
On January 19, 2024 at 0038 hours there was an incident that took place at 11001 S 1st St
involving a minor
yo Female) and 3 police officers. I witnessed 3 police officers hold her
down half outside of a police vehicle and inject something into her butt through her clothing. I am
very aware that this is unlawful practice if there are no paramedics present. The girl was crying
for help and to see her mother and the police officers were man handling her and injecting her
without proper medical staff present.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CITY OF OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0052
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Hodges AP9074
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: On January 19, 2024 at 0038 hours there was an incident that took
place at 11001 S 1st St involving a minor (16 yo Female) and 3 police officers. I witnessed 3
police officers hold her down half outside of a police vehicle and inject something into her butt
through her clothing. I am very aware that this is unlawful practice if there are no paramedics
present. The girl was crying for help and to see her mother and the police officers were man
handling her and injecting her without proper medical staff present.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6830
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CITY OF CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0052
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Igoe
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: On January 19, 2024 at 0038 hours there was an incident that took
place at 11001 S 1st St involving a minor (16 yo Female) and 3 police officers. I witnessed 3
police officers hold her down half outside of a police vehicle and inject something into her butt
through her clothing. I am very aware that this is unlawful practice if there are no paramedics
present. The girl was crying for help and to see her mother and the police officers were man
handling her and injecting her without proper medical staff present.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
1939
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0993
Date of Complaint: 10/2/24
Austin Police Officers Involved (If known):
Lyons, Wade (retired)
Complaint:
Commander Wade Lyons resigned, in lieu of termination, from the Austin Police Dept after a
lengthy sexual misconduct investigation involving a civilian co-worker. The Dept. DID NOT follow
up with TCOLE to have Lyons" peace officer license revoked. Lyons is now in the application
process for leadership positions at other agencies/depts. The Austin Police Dept is knowingly
allowing a sexual predator to continue to seek employment in law enforcement by neglecting
their responsibility to appeal for the revocation of Lyons" license. The Austin Police Dept has had
other Officers" licenses revoked for much less severe offenses resulting in resignation. The Austin
Police Dept has a history of protecting Officers of rank (Lt., Cmdr, AC) while punishing those of
only "Officer" rank.
FOUNDED
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0054
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Sanchez, Daniel AP9111, Brito, Markert
Complaint:
On December 19, 2023, a Travis County grand jury indicted Officer Daniel Sanchez for
third degree felony deadly conduct for his role in the shooting death of
After
Sanchez shot Mr.
he and two other officers, Markert and Brito, failed to
immediately render aid. The officers' failure to render aid is the basis of this complaint. While it is
our understanding that the Office of Police Oversight always assigns a representative to monitor
cases involving the use of deadly force by police officers, we are filing this complaint out of an
abundance of caution to ensure that attention is paid not only to the use of deadly force, but also
to the officers' critical failure to render aid.
All three officers approached Mr.
after he collapsed. Although Mr.
was
alive, he was bleeding profusely and unable to move due to multiple gunshot wounds in his chest,
back, abdomen, and thighs. At that time, it was objectively clear that Mr.
posed no
threat to the officers and desperately needed medical attention. As Officer Sanchez approached
Mr.
he told him to "roll over on your stomach, buddy, so we can help you." Officer
Market noted that Mr.
was "having trouble" as he remained motionless and
struggled to maintain consciousness.
Officer Sanchez then forced Mr.
onto his stomach. However, none of the officers
provided aid to Mr.
through immediate life-saving cardiopulmonary resuscitation
(CPR). Rather, Officer Markert told Officer Sanchez to "book: Mr. Moonesinghe. Officer Sanchez
then handcuffed Mr.
arms behind his back. Officer Brito failed to intervene to
ensure Mr.
received emergency medical attention. The officers then searched Mr.
house while he remained handcuffed on his porch, dying.
Other APD officers arrived on the scene several minutes later. One of the APD officers attempted
to perform CPR on Mr.
but was unable to provide such aid because of the handcuffs.
The officer explicitly told Officer Markert, Officer Brito, and Officer Sanchez that they "have to
uncuff [Mr.
You can't do CPR with him in cuffs." Despite the officer's attempts, Mr.
remained handcuffed for a critical additional two minutes until several emergency
medical technicians (EMT) arrived. It was only then that a senior officer ordered Mr.
to be taken out of the handcuffs for him to receive medical attention.
In total, after Officer Sanchez shot Mr.
five times, he remained handcuffed and did
not receive any medical attention for six (6) minutes. During this time, Mr.
was
bleeding profusely because one of the officer's bullets pierced the femoral artery in his leg and no
officer applied a tourniquet to attempt to stop the bleeding. Tragically, Mr.
died
from his injuries shortly afterward. Therefore, the purpose of this complaint is to ensure that
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CITY OF CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
every effort is taken to ensure that this does not happen again and that officers act quickly to
preserves lives like Mr.
after they are subjected to deadly force by the Austin
Police. Although Sanchez was indicted, this incident is still being reviewed by the Travis County
District Attorney's Office; therefore, it could be presented to another grand jury. Consequently,
criminal proceedings against them remain ongoing.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0054
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Sanchez, Daniel AP9111, Brito, Markert
Complaint:
On December 19, 2023, a Travis County grand jury indicted Officer Daniel Sanchez for
third degree felony deadly conduct for his role in the shooting death of
After
Sanchez shot Mr.
,
he and two other officers, Markert and Brito, failed to
immediately render aid. The officers' failure to render aid is the basis of this complaint. While it is
our understanding that the Office of Police Oversight always assigns a representative to monitor
cases involving the use of deadly force by police officers, we are filing this complaint out of an
abundance of caution to ensure that attention is paid not only to the use of deadly force, but also
to the officers' critical failure to render aid.
All three officers approached Mr.
after he collapsed. Although Mr.
was
alive, he was bleeding profusely and unable to move due to multiple gunshot wounds in his chest,
back, abdomen, and thighs. At that time, it was objectively clear that Mr.
posed no
threat to the officers and desperately needed medical attention. As Officer Sanchez approached
Mr.
,
he told him to "roll over on your stomach, buddy, so we can help you." Officer
Market noted that Mr.
was "having trouble" as he remained motionless and
struggled to maintain consciousness.
Officer Sanchez then forced Mr.
onto his stomach. However, none of the officers
provided aid to Mr.
through immediate life-saving cardiopulmonary resuscitation
(CPR). Rather, Officer Markert told Officer Sanchez to "book: Mr.
Officer Sanchez
then handcuffed Mr.
's arms behind his back. Officer Brito failed to intervene to
ensure Mr.
received emergency medical attention. The officers then searched Mr.
's house while he remained handcuffed on his porch, dying.
Other APD officers arrived on the scene several minutes later. One of the APD officers attempted
to perform CPR on Mr.
but was unable to provide such aid because of the handcuffs.
The officer explicitly told Officer Markert, Officer Brito, and Officer Sanchez that they "have to
uncuff [Mr.
]. You can't do CPR with him in cuffs." Despite the officer's attempts, Mr.
Moonesinghe remained handcuffed for a critical additional two minutes until several emergency
medical technicians (EMT) arrived. It was only then that a senior officer ordered Mr.
to be taken out of the handcuffs for him to receive medical attention.
In total, after Officer Sanchez shot Mr.
five times, he remained handcuffed and did
not receive any medical attention for six (6) minutes. During this time, Mr.
was
bleeding profusely because one of the officer's bullets pierced the femoral artery in his leg and no
officer applied a tourniquet to attempt to stop the bleeding. Tragically, Mr.
died
from his injuries shortly afterward. Therefore, the purpose of this complaint is to ensure that
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
every effort is taken to ensure that this does not happen again and that officers act quickly to
preserves lives like Mr.
's after they are subjected to deadly force by the Austin
Police. Although Sanchez was indicted, this incident is still being reviewed by the Travis County
District Attorney's Office; therefore, it could be presented to another grand jury. Consequently,
criminal proceedings against them remain ongoing.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED 1934
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0056
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Fabian AP8532
Complaint:
The complainant's daughter has a case going on with
Officer Austin Fabian
made contact via voicemail with the complainant from
,
asking the complainant to
contact him back regarding this case. The complainant didn't receive that message until last night
1/21/2024. She was informed by Detective Honaker that they had issued a warrant for
and that the tactical team would be picking him up. This warrant was not supposed to be
picked up by a patrol unit. Officer Fabian notified the family of
of this warrant,
which gave
the opportunity to contact his attorney and do a walk-through
instead of being picked up by the tactical unit. Which is not what the complainant asked for.
Because of this, her daughter will not get an emergency protective order and they were not
notified that he was ever picked up, nor were they notified he was released. The complainant
spoke with Officer Fabian and asked him why he served the warrant when the tactical unit was
supposed to. he said he spoke with the detective and the detective gave him this information. The
complainant then spoke with Detective Honaker who denied that officer Fabian was given this
information.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6339
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTINY
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED 1931
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0056
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Honaker AP7702, Fabian
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant's daughter has a case going on with Michael Corones.
Officer Austin Fabian made contact via voicemail with the complainant from
asking the complainant to contact him back regarding this case. The complainant didn't receive
that message until last night 1/21/2024. She was informed by Detective Honaker that they had
issued a warrant for Michael Corones and that the tactical team would be picking him up. This
warrant was not supposed to be picked up by a patrol unit. Officer Fabian notified the family of
Michael Corones of this warrant, which gave Michael Corones the opportunity to contact his
attorney and do a walk-through instead of being picked up by the tactical unit. Which is not what
the complainant asked for. Because of this, her daughter will not get an emergency protective
order and they were not notified that he was ever picked up, nor were they notified he was
released.
The complainant spoke with Officer Fabian and asked him why he served the warrant when the
tactical unit was supposed to. he said he spoke with the detective and the detective gave him this
information. The complainant then spoke with Detective Honaker who denied that officer Fabian
was given this information.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6881
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTT OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0057
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved: Ward AP9463
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
US
The complainant's 13-year-old neighbor came over crying and begging to come in because her
mother and her had gotten in a fight.
The mother of the child called the police.
At least four APD officers showed up at the complainant's house and tried to open the door
before even knocking on the door. The complainant believes they wouldn't have done that in a
better area of town. One of the officers started screaming in the complainant's face.
The complainant thinks it is absolutely ridiculous how this situation was handled and wildly
inappropriate that the officers tried to enter her home without a warrant and without even
knocking first.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6831
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
1939
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0058
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Bradley AP6757
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
The complainant was given a case number for a stolen vehicle report she made that is not able to
be located in the system. She hasn"t heard back from anyone about the case. The report number
is either 24-0180040 or 24-1180040.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0059
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Follow-up by Detective or Officer
Austin Police Officers Involved: Bolan AP5324
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
The complainant's daughter has been stalked by a person, and they have been trying to break into
her apartment since around October of 2023. In October, the police came out and assessed the
situation and wrote up a report. The officer then told her she doesn't have a case, but the
complainant doesn't know how that is possible when they have proof of someone breaking in.
Her daughter, who has autism, called again on Saturday, 1/20/2024, at an unknown time to make
another report. That report number is 24-5001505, and Det. Russ Bolan, badge # 5324, is in
charge of this case.
The complainant doesn't know what is happening with this case or why they can't do anything
about her daughter being harassed when they have proof.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0060
Date of Complaint: 1/22/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Arce AP8339
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
The complainant's son
33 years old, was falsely identified by officer Moses
Arce badge # 8339 as the person who broke a window at the Wendy's Hancock Center. There was
a warrant out for his arrest, he spent 3 weeks in jail, plead guilty per his public defenders advice,
and was released on time served.
The complainant went to the Wendy's to show them a picture of her son and ask them if he was
the one who broke the window. Wendy's employees identified another person who broke the
window. The complainant wants the charges dropped because her son was falsely identified by a
police officer.
Case # 23-2191059 Det Stacy Anderson and Sgt. Joshua Dozier
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTINY
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
1939
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0061
Date of Complaint: 1/23/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
X
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Valdovino AP5123
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
Badge #AP5123 Officer Valdovino
Narcissistic and on a constant power trip.
Rudimentary comprehension of English, creating a major disservice in his attempts to safely
serve the community.
An individual who has less than an intermediate school level of English comprehension should
not be enforcing laws in the English language.
Never have I been asked SO many questions, only to then immediately be rudely interrupted when
I attempt to respond.
0 communication / listening skills.
If this is the type of officer you employ it is no surprise the community has no trust in your police
department
Any new programs for community/police relationship training, he should be first on the list
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Community Concern
FOUNDED
6831
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
1931
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0063
Date of Complaint: 1/23/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Pena AP6479
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
Officer Peña of the child abuse department created a completely factually inaccurate report from
beginning to end, which appears cut and pasted from a highly redacted, edited, and inaccurate
account of a 311 call made by the family of the victim in the case. The false information includes
fake dates, fake sleeping arrangements, fake additional beds that don't exist, victim blaming of a 6
year old child who has no concept of consent or sexual assault, and a total omission of all of the
concerning predatory behaviors of the offender. The officer even fictitiously listed the victim's
parent as an "offender" in his false investigation and report. The only contact the officer ever had
with the victim and victim's family in this "investigation" was a 30 second phone call to advise he
had already closed the case without investigating or speaking to the victim or victim's parents.
The events listed in the report were never obtained by the officer. The 1st grader who is a victim
in this case was formally assessed by her MD and was found to have
as a result of
being
even while unconscious and in her sleep- facts which
were all completely omitted from the report, leaving the community and future children highly at
risk because the offender will not receive any treatment for their criminal and predatory
behavior. The officer was negligent in his investigation and refused to even collect the relevant
documentation to the case which is attached below. I ask that an investigation be completed with
an officer who will complete factual documentation.
NDED
18
01/23/2024 09:25 AM
Officer Description:
Eduardo Pena 6479
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0068
Date of Complaint: 1/24/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Excessive Force
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Smart AP8674, Perricone AP8428, Cadenas AP7407, Groenloh AP8205
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
On March 20, 2022 while pulled over on the north curb- 7th and san Jacinto, at an unknown time.
Two unknown and unidentified officers approached my vehicle window door and passenger door.
Weapons drawn In an execution style manner. In this area was no visible light as I was
unknowably pulled over illegally. Officers at gun point asked did I have any weapons on me. I
immediately attempted to turn my vehicle off and exit. The two unknown officers heightened
demanding an answer at gun point. I answered yes and told them I am legally licensed to carry.
The unknown officer at my driver door opened my door and removed me from my vehicle.
Placing me into handcuffs. The unknown officers began to frisk and remove my weapon and
identification cards. During this time multiple officers responded to the scene. I can remember a
white, chubby, blonde female officer being on the scene last name collins, along with officer
#8428 arriving lastly who was white, blonde, with a long shaggy hairstyle and clean shaven face.
At this time in the arrest I was still in handcuffs. Officers completed my vehicle, gun, and
insurance searches which all came back of good standing. In the initial encounter of the unknown
officer removing me from my vehicle he did not close my vehicle which remained ajar while I was
in handcuffs. Officer #8428 began to peer into and go through my car finding marijuana in my car.
Officer #8428 began to question me and I declined answering any questions. During this arrest
officers committed many violations of the Austin police department. Officer #8428 wrote a false
report in writing concealing the two unknown officers identities who walked up to my vehicle at
gun point. Officer #8428 was dishonest in his entire affidavit distorting the facts of this case and
being dishonest violating 900.3.1 and 900.3.2. Officer #8428 never placed handcuffs on me and
nor did he talk me out of my vehicle. I was forced out of my vehicle by an unknown officer who
was tall, white, dark hair and dark beard at gun point. Officer #8428 was only factual of peering
into my vehicle against my will as I declined him of doing. Resulting in my physical remembrance
of him at the scene lastly and his actions. Officer #8428 and the two unknown officers violated
many general orders set forth the Austin police department. During this unlawful arrest and
unjustly arrest. Violating 914.3.2 (B) creating a hostile environment having produced no
identification with weapons drawn. Violating 900.3.1 and 900.3.2, Officer #8428 refrained from
speaking truth in his report in writing off his placement and actions as he did not place me in
hand cuffs nor talk me out of my vehicle. Officer #8428 distorted the facts and concealed the The
City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable
modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. identities of
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
the two unknown officers who approached my vehicle at gun point in a execution style manner in
a dark area. Destroying my public confidence in the department as these officers thwarted
together to possibly influence great harm and an actual criminal investigation based off a non
hazardous traffic violation. Officer #8428 and the unknown officers if bestowed upon should
have all had on body worn cameras during this pursuit and arrest, which will suffice in officer
#8428 dishonesty who was not initially on the scene as though he placed himself on his false
report and officer collins whose body worn camera might can help identify the two unknown
officers ,according to 303.3.1, The officers showed no courtesy and imposed impartial attitudes
neglecting duty, showing very ill purpose and scope. Officer #8428 violated many general orders
along with the unknown officers resulting in this unlawful and unjust arrest. In which officers are
supposed to respect the rights of individuals and perform their services with honesty, sincerity,
courage and sound judgement. Whom all failed to do so during this fearful and unlawful arrest
having weapons pointed at me and hostility all awhile not knowing the identities of these officers
and officer #8428 concealing the facts as a public official and being dishonest on a affidavit
Note* Affidavit for Warrant of arrest is attached in the email complaint. Cause number 22-
202690
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Formal Complaint
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0068
Date of Complaint: 1/24/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Excessive Force
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Smart AP8674, Perricone AP8428, Cadenas AP7407, Groenloh AP8205
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
On March 20, 2022 while pulled over on the north curb- 7th and san Jacinto, at an unknown time.
Two unknown and unidentified officers approached my vehicle window door and passenger door.
Weapons drawn In an execution style manner. In this area was no visible light as I was
unknowably pulled over illegally. Officers at gun point asked did I have any weapons on me. I
immediately attempted to turn my vehicle off and exit. The two unknown officers heightened
demanding an answer at gun point. I answered yes and told them I am legally licensed to carry.
The unknown officer at my driver door opened my door and removed me from my vehicle.
Placing me into handcuffs. The unknown officers began to frisk and remove my weapon and
identification cards. During this time multiple officers responded to the scene. I can remember a
white, chubby, blonde female officer being on the scene last name collins, along with officer
#8428 arriving lastly who was white, blonde, with a long shaggy hairstyle and clean shaven face.
At this time in the arrest I was still in handcuffs. Officers completed my vehicle, gun, and
insurance searches which all came back of good standing. In the initial encounter of the unknown
officer removing me from my vehicle he did not close my vehicle which remained ajar while I was
in handcuffs. Officer #8428 began to peer into and go through my car finding marijuana in my car.
Officer #8428 began to question me and I declined answering any questions. During this arrest
officers committed many violations of the Austin police department. Officer #8428 wrote a false
report in writing concealing the two unknown officers identities who walked up to my vehicle at
gun point. Officer #8428 was dishonest in his entire affidavit distorting the facts of this case and
being dishonest violating 900.3.1 and 900.3.2. Officer #8428 never placed handcuffs on me and
nor did he talk me out of my vehicle. I was forced out of my vehicle by an unknown officer who
was tall, white, dark hair and dark beard at gun point. Officer #8428 was only factual of peering
into my vehicle against my will as I declined him of doing. Resulting in my physical remembrance
of him at the scene lastly and his actions. Officer #8428 and the two unknown officers violated
many general orders set forth the Austin police department. During this unlawful arrest and
unjustly arrest. Violating 914.3.2 (B) creating a hostile environment having produced no
identification with weapons drawn. Violating 900.3.1 and 900.3.2, Officer #8428 refrained from
speaking truth in his report in writing off his placement and actions as he did not place me in
hand cuffs nor talk me out of my vehicle. Officer #8428 distorted the facts and concealed the The
City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable
modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. identities of
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
the two unknown officers who approached my vehicle at gun point in a execution style manner in
a dark area. Destroying my public confidence in the department as these officers thwarted
together to possibly influence great harm and an actual criminal investigation based off a non
hazardous traffic violation. Officer #8428 and the unknown officers if bestowed upon should
have all had on body worn cameras during this pursuit and arrest, which will suffice in officer
#8428 dishonesty who was not initially on the scene as though he placed himself on his false
report and officer collins whose body worn camera might can help identify the two unknown
officers ,according to 303.3.1, The officers showed no courtesy and imposed impartial attitudes
neglecting duty, showing very ill purpose and scope. Officer #8428 violated many general orders
along with the unknown officers resulting in this unlawful and unjust arrest. In which officers are
supposed to respect the rights of individuals and perform their services with honesty, sincerity,
courage and sound judgement. Whom all failed to do so during this fearful and unlawful arrest
having weapons pointed at me and hostility all awhile not knowing the identities of these officers
and officer #8428 concealing the facts as a public official and being dishonest on a affidavit
Note* Affidavit for Warrant of arrest is attached in the email complaint. Cause number 22-
202690
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Formal Complaint
FOUNDED
6830
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0068
Date of Complaint: 1/24/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Excessive Force
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Smart AP8674, Perricone AP8428, Cadenas AP7407, Groenloh AP8205
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
On March 20, 2022 while pulled over on the north curb- 7th and san Jacinto, at an unknown time.
Two unknown and unidentified officers approached my vehicle window door and passenger door.
Weapons drawn In an execution style manner. In this area was no visible light as I was
unknowably pulled over illegally. Officers at gun point asked did I have any weapons on me. I
immediately attempted to turn my vehicle off and exit. The two unknown officers heightened
demanding an answer at gun point. I answered yes and told them I am legally licensed to carry.
The unknown officer at my driver door opened my door and removed me from my vehicle.
Placing me into handcuffs. The unknown officers began to frisk and remove my weapon and
identification cards. During this time multiple officers responded to the scene. I can remember a
white, chubby, blonde female officer being on the scene last name collins, along with officer
#8428 arriving lastly who was white, blonde, with a long shaggy hairstyle and clean shaven face.
At this time in the arrest I was still in handcuffs. Officers completed my vehicle, gun, and
insurance searches which all came back of good standing. In the initial encounter of the unknown
officer removing me from my vehicle he did not close my vehicle which remained ajar while I was
in handcuffs. Officer #8428 began to peer into and go through my car finding marijuana in my car.
Officer #8428 began to question me and I declined answering any questions. During this arrest
officers committed many violations of the Austin police department. Officer #8428 wrote a false
report in writing concealing the two unknown officers identities who walked up to my vehicle at
gun point. Officer #8428 was dishonest in his entire affidavit distorting the facts of this case and
being dishonest violating 900.3.1 and 900.3.2. Officer #8428 never placed handcuffs on me and
nor did he talk me out of my vehicle. I was forced out of my vehicle by an unknown officer who
was tall, white, dark hair and dark beard at gun point. Officer #8428 was only factual of peering
into my vehicle against my will as I declined him of doing. Resulting in my physical remembrance
of him at the scene lastly and his actions. Officer #8428 and the two unknown officers violated
many general orders set forth the Austin police department. During this unlawful arrest and
unjustly arrest. Violating 914.3.2 (B) creating a hostile environment having produced no
identification with weapons drawn. Violating 900.3.1 and 900.3.2, Officer #8428 refrained from
speaking truth in his report in writing off his placement and actions as he did not place me in
hand cuffs nor talk me out of my vehicle. Officer #8428 distorted the facts and concealed the The
City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act. Reasonable
modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. identities of
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
the two unknown officers who approached my vehicle at gun point in a execution style manner in
a dark area. Destroying my public confidence in the department as these officers thwarted
together to possibly influence great harm and an actual criminal investigation based off a non
hazardous traffic violation. Officer #8428 and the unknown officers if bestowed upon should
have all had on body worn cameras during this pursuit and arrest, which will suffice in officer
#8428 dishonesty who was not initially on the scene as though he placed himself on his false
report and officer collins whose body worn camera might can help identify the two unknown
officers ,according to 303.3.1, The officers showed no courtesy and imposed impartial attitudes
neglecting duty, showing very ill purpose and scope. Officer #8428 violated many general orders
along with the unknown officers resulting in this unlawful and unjust arrest. In which officers are
supposed to respect the rights of individuals and perform their services with honesty, sincerity,
courage and sound judgement. Whom all failed to do so during this fearful and unlawful arrest
having weapons pointed at me and hostility all awhile not knowing the identities of these officers
and officer #8428 concealing the facts as a public official and being dishonest on a affidavit
Note* Affidavit for Warrant of arrest is attached in the email complaint. Cause number 22-
202690
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Formal Complaint
FOUNDED
6830
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0068
Date of Complaint: 1/24/2024
Complainant's Name (if given): Conyers, Malik
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Excessive Force
Austin Police Officers Involved: Smart AP8674. Perricone AP8428, Cadenas AP7407,
Groenloh AP8205
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
On March 20, 2022 while pulled over on the north curb- 7th and san Jacinto, at an unknown time.
Two unknown and unidentified officers approached my vehicle window door and passenger door.
Weapons drawn In an execution style manner. In this area was no visible light as I was
unknowably pulled over illegally. Officers at gun point asked did I have any weapons on me. I
immediately attempted to turn my vehicle off and exit. The two unknown officers heightened
demanding an answer at gun point. I answered yes and told them I am legally licensed to carry.
The unknown officer at my driver door opened my door and removed me from my vehicle.
Placing me into handcuffs. The unknown officers began to frisk and remove my weapon and
identification cards. During this time multiple officers responded to the scene. I can remember a
white, chubby, blonde female officer being on the scene last name collins, along with officer
#8428 arriving lastly who was white, blonde, with a long shaggy hairstyle and clean shaven face.
At this time in the arrest I was still in handcuffs. Officers completed my vehicle, gun, and
insurance searches which all came back of good standing. In the initial encounter of the unknown
officer removing me from my vehicle he did not close my vehicle which remained ajar while I was
in handcuffs. Officer #8428 began to peer into and go through my car finding marijuana in my car.
Officer #8428 began to question me and I declined answering any questions. During this arrest
officers committed many violations of the Austin police department. Officer #8428 wrote a false
report in writing concealing the two unknown officers identities who walked up to my vehicle at
gun point. Officer #8428 was dishonest in his entire affidavit distorting the facts of this case and
being dishonest violating 900.3.1 and 900.3.2. Officer #8428 never placed handcuffs on me and
nor did he talk me out of my vehicle. I was forced out of my vehicle by an unknown officer who
was tall, white, dark hair and dark beard at gun point. Officer #8428 was only factual of peering
into my vehicle against my will as I declined him of doing. Resulting in my physical remembrance
of him at the scene lastly and his actions. Officer #8428 and the two unknown officers violated
many general orders set forth the Austin police department. During this unlawful arrest and
unjustly arrest. Violating 914.3.2 (B) creating a hostile environment having produced no
identification with weapons drawn. Violating 900.3.1 and 900.3.2, Officer #8428 refrained from
speaking truth in his report in writing off his placement and actions as he did not place me in
hand cuffs nor talk me out of my vehicle. Officer #8428 distorted the facts and concealed the
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GEBY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
identities of the two unknown officers who approached my vehicle at gun point in a execution
style manner in a dark area. Destroying my public confidence in the department as these officers
thwarted together to possibly influence great harm and an actual criminal investigation based off
a non hazardous traffic violation. Officer #8428 and the unknown officers if bestowed upon
should have all had on body worn cameras during this pursuit and arrest, which will suffice in
officer #8428 dishonesty who was not initially on the scene as though he placed himself on his
false report and officer collins whose body worn camera might can help identify the two
unknown officers ,according to 303.3.1, The officers showed no courtesy and imposed impartial
attitudes neglecting duty, showing very ill purpose and scope. Officer #8428 violated many
general orders along with the unknown officers resulting in this unlawful and unjust arrest.
In which officers are supposed to respect the rights of individuals and perform their services with
honesty, sincerity, courage and sound judgement. Whom all failed to do so during this fearful and
unlawful arrest having weapons pointed at me and hostility all awhile not knowing the identities
of these officers and officer #8428 concealing the facts as a public official and being dishonest on
a affidavit
Note* Affidavit for Warrant of arrest is attached in the email complaint. Cause number 22-
202690
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Formal Complaint
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
1934
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0069
Date of Complaint: 1/24/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Bias Based Policing
Austin Police Officers Involved: Doss AP9224
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges:
I drove the wrong way down a one way with improper signage that was blocked by construction
equipment on Guadalupe street.
I pulled over into a garage opening at 9:37 pm & stopped my car so I could turn around. While I
was pulled over already the police came up to my car for no reason. They told me I turned down a
one way and I said I know that is why I pulled over to turn around.
I told Sarah Doss that someone hit & run my car the other day when I was coming out of my
apartment parking garage & I asked her to check to see when I would be getting my 14 day non
emergency call back. She told me she couldn"t find it so I asked her if she could make a new
report. I gave her the address of the incident which was davis street on the corner of
in front of the
I gave her the date & time which was a few days before the
traffic stop. She did not give me my report number, I needed this for my company.
She asked for my ID & I reached into a bag under my Scat grab my purse. I had a closed 6 pack
of seltzers in my car & a completely closed bottle of wine. I wasn't drinking the wine it was just
leftover trash from a professional event I was working at 11:00 am. All of this was put away in a
bag underneath my seat.
Sarah Doss only saw it because I had to get my purse. She assumed my ID was fake & that I was
underaged then she ran my ID. She gave it back then made me do a field sobriety test.
I had to walk in a line & take 9 steps but she did a demonstration only taking 3 steps pivoting then
taking 3 more. I started doing the line test then I stopped on step 3 to ask if I was supposed to do
6 like she did in the demo or 9 like she said in the beginning. She said I failed the test & that I was
drunk because I asked a reasonable question.
She made me stand on one foot but I requested a reasonable disability accomodation. I told her I
have flat feet & I have never been able to stand on one foot. I go to Yoga & I have to hold onto
something. She forced me to take the one foot test while already knowing that my physical
disability made it impossible for me to stand on one foot which isn't fair.
After this she shined a light in my pupils then said I look drunk but I did not have anything to
drink.
She asked if I drank anything & I said I had 3 5oz glasses of wine at noon. The traffic stop was at
9:37 5/28/22 so my BAC was zero.
She illegally arrested me because I said I drank 3 glasses of wine at noon. This is legal & proves I
was driving sober at 9:37. She didn't read me my miranda rights. I demanded a breathalyzer &
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
1934
POLICE OVERSIGHT
she refused at first because she was racist. She violated my civil rights. I am the victim of a racist
hate crime. She finally breathlyzed me and I blew a 0.00 then she wrote that the breathlyzer was
broken when it was fully functional. She told me that even though I blew zero she was going to
arrest me. This is a racist hate crime. I told her that I demanded a new breathalyzer but she put
me in handcuffs.
Since she had no proof I was drinking & driving, a 0.00 BAC, and closed containers in my vehicle
under the back seat she placed me under arrest with no warrant or probable cause. This is police
brutality, a civil rights violation, and a racist hate crime.
I offered to take a 24 hour urine test the next day at noon to prove I drank no alcohol from May
28th 12:01pm-May 29th 12:01 pm but they kept me in jail for 24 hours but they kept me in jail
from May 28th 11pm-May 29th 9pm so that I couldn't take the pee test to prove I was innocent.
While I was in jail they refused to let me contact an attorney. They took my cell phone away. I
asked to go to sleep & they made me sleep on a bench. I did not get my own room or a bed until
3:30AM. I asked for food, water, a book & they didn't feed me. They placed me in solitary
confinement with no food, water, or book. They wouldn't let me take my birth control or adhd
medication. They wouldn't let me shower.
There were 3 white people who were booked the same time as me. All of them got to meet with a
judge before I did at 11am. I didn't get to meet with a judge until 4pm. The judge told me that I
had a BAC of over 0.15 but I blew 0.00 on the field breathlyzer.
This is not fair. I met with a judge at 4 & asked him to release me so I can take a urine test to
prove I had no alcohol in 24 hours from May 28th 4pm -May 29th 4pm. He wouldn't let me leave
until 7pm just so I could not prove my innoncence. They are trying to frame me.
Sarah Doss lied on the incident report & said that I had a collision at the traffic stop which is not
true. The body camer shows my car was pulled over with no vehicles present.
1.I told Sarah Doss at the stop that I was in a collision on 5/23/22 at
intersection because someone hit & run me at the
when trying to move around a
commercial vehicle. My car was at a complete stop so they are at fault.
2.Sarah doss lied that this collision I already reported to 311 several days prior happened on
5/28 so she could try to get me arrested. I requested an ALR hearing on May 30th by calling the
number on the bond paperwork. I did not recieve my hearing date so I won the hearing. Sarah
Doss did not show up to the hearing.
3.1 was pulled over in an illegal traffic stop because my car was stopped in a garage opening &
they had no reason to approach me while my car was stopped with hazards on. I was not in the
road.
4.1 had closed containers in my car put away under the back seat then forced to take a field
sobriety test. Sarah Doss did not accuse me of drinking until she saw the alcohol under the seat.
She was just looking for any reason to arrest me because I'm black
5.1 took the field sobriety walking test & she demonstrated 6 steps but said 9 so I asked for
clarification. Stopping to ask the question proves I was sober because I didn't want to fail the test.
6.My pupils have been the same my entire life there was nothing different about them on 11/23
7.1 told Sarah Doss that I cannot stand on one foot because of my disability. I have flat feet with
bumps on the side of my feet because I was abused & not given any shoes that fit when I was
younger. She denied me a reasonable accommodation. This is the same as asking someone in a
wheelchair to walk then arresting them for not being able to walk. There is no excuse for this &
this is disability discrimination.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
8.She asked me if I drank & I said not while driving. Drinking over 21 is not probable cause that I
was drinking & driving. She placed me under arrest with no probable cause. She didn't read my
miranda rights either. I demanded a breathalyzer & she refused at first. This proves that she was
being racist & trying to arrest me for no reason.
9.1 demanded a breathalyzer but she was refusing. She finally gave me one I blew a 0.00 so she
kept making me retake the breathalyzer. She lied & said it was broken then arrested me with a
0.00 reading
10.She lied that I blew above a 0.15 and got in a collision on the police report. There was no
collision & she stopped me when I was pulled over. The body camera footage shows I was not
collided with anything.
11. She placed me in handcuffs & was behaving aggressively, made the handcuffs too tight, and
yelled at me. This is police brutality.
12. I was not allowed to call any attorneys or anyone else in jail. They took my phone away so I
couldn't call anyone.
13. I asked to take a pee alcohol test to prove I wasn't guilty but they refused to release me for 24
hours just so I could not take the test.
14. You are supposed to go home immediately in jail as soon as you pay to leave. They would not
let me meet with the judge for 24 hours.
15. I was not given a bed or water for 5 hours. There was no water in my cell. I was placed in
solitary confinement. I was not given any food, water, adhd medication, or birth control for 24
hours. I was denied a book. All of the white people got to go in & out of their cell at their leisure.
There was two white people in jail with prior offenses & they got to leave before I did for free.
This is jail brutality.
After I left there were ignition interlock device companies emailing me without my
consent. My license was not suspended. I called three days later to re
aring to
keep my license. I was not given a hearing so my li
ve & I should get to keep my
hearing.
I retained Hayden Bordeaux at Stephen T Bowling & Associates telling them this information. I
told them I was not guilty & they guaranteed to get my case dismissed as well as represent me for
the ALR hearing.
I requested the hearing myself within 14 days & then I called them. They said they were waiting
on the date & time & that they would let me know when the hearing was but I haven't heard from
them so I get to keep my license. I asked Hayden to ask them when it was & he said I didn't have
one yet. I still have not been given my hearing. It has been 2 years SO I should get to keep my
license.
They are delaying my hearing on purpose just so to be racist & suspend my license.
Hayden lied to me & told me that I was on probation before my first court date so I could not
drink. I haven't drank in 2 years. It turns out I was not on probation the entire time. He said the
court ordered me to take a MADD class before my first court date but they did not. He said my
case would be dismissed if I took a MADD class so I took the MADD class. I am not guilty & if this
wasn't court ordered I want a refund.
After I took the MADD class I gave him a certificate of completion & he said my case could only be
dismissed with 6 months of alcohol monitoring. He tried forcing me to plead guilty & I refused. I
told him I was not guilty so I wanted to plead not guilty.
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
I told him that my primary care doctor is racist & refused to see black patients unless they take
monthly drug tests. My insurance wouldn't cover these drug tests because they aren't medically
necessary. These drug tests also test for alcohol & I have several of them that prove I don't drink
regularly. My primary care doctor still treats black patients who drink he just won't treat black
patients who do drugs recreationally which is racist.
He prescribes adderall for my adhd so that shows up on the drug test but he doesn't treat patients
who do any other drugs. The adderall is amphetamines. I told Hayden to give the drug/alcohol
tests to the court since I already had to pay for them to receive primary care & I explicitly said to
mention that the amphetamine is my adhd medication. If Hayden is lazy & forgets to say that they
would assume it was the use of methampetimine which is illegal so this was important for him to
say. If they needed proof that I was prescribed this I also told him I could provide that.
Hayden did not give my drug tests to the prosecutor at all & he overcharged me. I bought a hair
alcohol test that detects alcohol use in any amount for 60-90 days & I had to pay out of pocket for
this. I took one & it came back negative. Hayden didn't give this to the prosecutor either.
I have no idea what he said to them in court because I wasn't required to appear but I want my
case dismissed immediately. I was stopped at an illegal traffic stop, had closed containers in my
car, was not in any collision, and the officer refused to breathalyze me. I blew a 0.00 on the field
breathlyzer so I should not have been arrested. I was required to spend 24 hours in jail so I
couldn't get a pee test to prove I didn't drink & drive.
Sarah Doss lied on the police report & said I had a collision + above 0.15 BAC when the body
camera footage shows I had a 0.00 BAC.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Formal Complaint
FOUNDED
6839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTL OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0070
Date of Complaint: 1/24/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Dyess, James
Unknown:
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: She called the police in Clairemont, Texas, and the Austin police because
someone went in person to a hotel in Austin and tried to use her credit card which she did not
authorize. She named people in Austin in her report just to identify people that she knew in
Austin but not to be investigated. Information was sent to the Austin Police Department from the
Clairemont Police Department. After August 30th she supplied information that was requested
by APD. When she observed the information that she and the Clairemont Police Department had
provided to APD the information had been altered. It appeared to have been auto-populated. She
requested that the information be corrected. Someone named James Dyess with the APD
Financial Crime Unit stated it could not be changed. Eventually, James Dyess indicated he could
change it. She knows he delayed it because he did not want the unit to be perceived as altering
the report. Within the report, there were other identity changes. It is a matter of public safety.
She has concerns.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0072
Date of Complaint: 1/26/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Houser AP8345, Smart AP8674
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: Patrick Talley & Paul 'Brien put ransomware on my computer. They
ported my business emails using Google takeout then started threatening me for payment on
6/19. I did not ask either of them for IP or customer protection. I did not agree to work with
Patrick at all. Patrick Talley was impersonating an insurance agent without a license. On 6/21 I
called 911 several times & Patrick Talley answered the phone. He said his name is Craig
Fairbrother. A girl named Megan from Integral care came to my house with 3 police officers. They
said they were his friend & started threatening me. They kidnapped me, handcuffed me, and took
me to dell seton. They said they wanted my brain. I am demanding the body camera foottage &
phone recordings. Here is my medical record from Dell Seton. It says that EMCOT took me there
on POED. At Dell Seton there was a medical device replaced without my consent. Part of my skull
was removed. I want this neuralink chip removed from my brain. I am miserable & it hurts. It
gives me headaches, causes loss of sleep, and I want it taken out now for free. Patrick Talley needs
to go to jail.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6830
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTT OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0072
Date of Complaint: 1/26/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Smart AP8674, Houser AP8345
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
US
Patrick Talley & Paul O"Brien put ransomware on my computer. They ported my business emails
using Google takeout then started threatening me for payment on 6/19.
I did not ask either of them for IP or customer protection. I did not agree to work with Patrick at
all. Patrick Talley was impersonating an insurance agent without a license.
On 6/21 I called 911 several times & Patrick Talley answered the phone. He said his name is Craig
Fairbrother. A girl named Megan from Integral care came to my house with 3 police officers. They
said they were his friend & started threatening me. They kidnapped me, handcuffed me, and took
me to dell seton. They said they wanted my brain.
I am demanding the body camera foottage & phone recordings. Here is my medical record from
Dell Seton. It says that EMCOT took me there on POED.
At Dell Seton there was a medical device replaced without my consent. Part of my skull was
removed.
I want this neuralink chip removed from my brain. I am miserable & it hurts. It gives me
headaches, causes loss of sleep, and I want it taken out now for free.
Patrick Talley needs to go to jail.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED 1934
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0073
Date of Complaint: 1/26/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Jennings AP7076, Lomovstev AP6317
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
I'm am afraid for my life, the interview took place at building 4 1520 Rutherford In btw 2pm and
3:33pm. Two gang unit officers witnessed the detective unlawfully steal my car and withhold my
property.
I'm afraid they are going to hurt me because I caught them breaking the law. Because the cases
they have are not going to hold up in court. I need the protection of states attorneys office to
suspend these officers and file criminal charges on them
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 5:10 PM
wrote:
Continued documents
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 5:10 PM
wrote:
To day whiling interviewing with a auto theft detective, believed to be detective Olge. Stole my
vehicle. He did not have a warrant and forced me to give him my keys, he with held paperwork of
my lawful ownership of the vehicle.
He was angry that the police department broke the law and I addressed it. That car is registered
to me.
01/30/2024 10:04 AM
Complainant alleged the actions taken were in retaliation to him filing a previous OPO complaint.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
NDED
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTINY
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED 1934
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0073
Date of Complaint: 1/26/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Lomovstev AP6317
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: I'm am afraid for my life, the interview took place at building 4 1520
Rutherford In btw 2pm and 3:33pm. Two gang unit officers witnessed the detective unlawfully
steal my car and withhold my property. I'm afraid they are going to hurt me because I caught
them breaking the law. Because the cases they have are not going to hold up in court. I need the
protection of states attorneys office to suspend these officers and file criminal charges on them
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 5:10 PM
wrote: Continued documents On Thu, Jan 25, 2024,
5:10 PM James Sailors wrote: To day whiling interviewing with a auto theft detective, believed to
be detective Olge. Stole my vehicle. He did not have a warrant and forced me to give him my keys,
he with held paperwork of my lawful ownership of the vehicle. He was angry that the police
department broke the law and I addressed it. That car is registered to me. 01/30/2024 10:04 AM
Complainant alleged the actions taken were in retaliation to him filing a previous OPO complaint.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
6839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF
CITY
AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
6581
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0080
Date of Complaint: 1/26/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Sim AP9115
Unknown:
Complaint:
Complainant alleges: Mr.
said he resides with his partner,
at
Mr.
said his property backs up to the
Apartments located at
Mr.
said the
Apartments are managed by the
Mr.
said the
Apartments contracted with a service to
trim the trees that border the apartments property line and backs up to his home. Mr.
said the contractor, a Hispanic male in his mid-forties (40) began trimming the trees
resulting in the branches falling onto his property. Mr.
said there is a wire fence
that separates the two properties. Mr.
said he and his partner confronted the
confronted the contractor about the tree branches falling on his property. Mr.
said
the contractor became irate and began taunting him and his partner to climb the fence onto the
side where he was located. Mr.
said he wanted to avoid any further confrontation
between the contractor and him.
Mr.
said he initially called 3-1-1 who directed him to call 9-1-1. Mr.
said an Officer Win responded to his residence. Mr.
said the Officer responded in
approximately ten (10) to twenty (20) minutes after he called 9-1-1 (12:26 pm). Mr.
said he doesn't recall the Officer Win's badge number or patrol vehicle identification
number. Mr.
said he told Officer Win that he would like to have the contractor cited
for illegal dumping on his property. Mr.
said Officer Win went and spoke to the
contractor who volunteered to come to his property and retrieve the fallen branches. Mr.
said he declined the contractors offer because he didn't want him to come onto his
property, injure himself and then sue them. Mr.
said he asked Officer Win if he
could issue the contractor a citation for illegal dumping. Mr.
said Officer Win told
him that he wasn't sure if he had the authority to cite the contractor and would have to check
with his supervisor. Mr.
said Officer Win called his supervisor who advised him that
he would have to call the City's Code Department who had the authority to cite the contractor.
Mr.
said on this date, January 26, 2024, he called the Code Department who
dispatched a Code Enforcement Officer to his property. Mr.
said the Code
Enforcement Officer responded to his residence at about 1:30 PM. Mr.
said the
Officer's first name was "Gavin." Mr.
said the Code Enforcement Officer informed
him that he had not authority to cite someone for dumping on private property, and that he
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
would have to notify the Austin Police Department who had the authority to cite someone
because illegal dumping is a 3rd Class Misdemeanor.
Mr.
said there is no damage to his property, and that the debris is still on his
property. Mr.
said he does not want to file an official complaint against APD Officer
Win but would like his supervisor to contact him to determine who has legal authority to cite the
contractor for dumping, and if APD does in fact have the authority to cite the contractor, to
educate his/her officers so they are aware of their authority. Mr.
would also like
APD to cite the contractor if it's determined that they do have the legal authority to do so. Mr.
said he spoke to the
Apartment Manager who did not provide any relief in
this matter.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
1939
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0083
Date of Complaint: 1/29/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved: Miller AP9091
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
US
The complainant was concerned about an incident happening across the street from his house, so
he went outside to inquire about what was happening. The officer, instead of being helpful or
informative, threatened that he was interfering with an investigation and informed him he
needed to leave, which the complainant felt was an inappropriate response.
There is a long list of incidents happening at the residence and a history of APD not doing
anything about it. The complainant identified the officer he spoke with as Officer Miller.
The complainant requested a supervisor speak to him to address Officer Miller"s demeanor.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
FOUNDED
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED 1934
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0084
Date of Complaint: 1/29/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Excessive Force
Austin Police Officers Involved: Gutierrez, Gabriel AP8063
Unknown:
The complainant alleges:
F
On behalf of my clients
and
, I file this complaint against
Officer Gabrielle Gutierrez (AP#8063). The Office of Police oversight previously recommended
that Officer Gutierrez be indefinitely suspended due to his actions in connection with the officer-
involved shooting of
and
on 1/5/2021. Office Gutierrez gave
deposition testimony on 12/5/2023 regarding this OIS. With this complaint, we ask OPO to
investigate: (1) whether Officer Gutierrez gave false and/or misleading testimony during his
deposition and (2) whether the deposition reveals that Officer Gutierrez made previous false or
misleading statements about the events. We also ask OPO to take a second look at Officer
Gutierrez"s actions in connection with the underlying OIS. Please see the attached letter for
further details.
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Choose an item.
FOUNDED
6839
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTL OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0086
Date of Complaint: 1/30/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Discourtesy or Improper Conduct
Austin Police Officers Involved: Hattaway AP7994
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
while driving home from work i had an officer brake check myself and also veered onto shoulder
almost hitting cyclist. i told the officer to pull over in which he attempted to flee. once in parking
lot he acted very unprofessional yelling at me to re enter my vehicle after exiting to confront him
about the unsafe manor in which he is acting. he had a ridiculous attitude and tried to act like i
was the one in the wrong i have the full video and will attempt to send it if it does not go through
ill be happy to put in on a usb drive and get it to you. i do want to know what action is to be taken
against this officer as this video has been shared publicly, and others have the same questions i do
because this type of behavior is unacceptable.
this happened on january29,2024 around 17:50 heading north on brodie. the officer was a white
male i could point him out in a line up. squad car 8975 if you would like the plate number ill be
happy to give that as well ive attached a short video of the incident including the person in the
bike lane that he almost hit when confronted the officer stated he was communicating with the
cyclist. in what world can anyone communicate that fast? the only communication i saw was an
APD officer almost run over a cyclist. i have the full video upon request. also a response is
required have a good day
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
NDED
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTC OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
FOUNDED
GERY
POLICE OVERSIGHT
Complaint Number: 2024-0089
Date of Complaint: 1/31/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature of complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved:
Unknown:
Sevier AP8792, Collins AP9054, Burnsed AP6033
Complaint:
The complainant alleges: Good evening i want to submit a complaint against sgt Eric Burnsed and
LT Jobes I want to inform you that I had an accident on 10-16-2021 Saturday night, the girl who
hit me from the back of my truck was drunk and also she was on the phone I have her on the
video, I am contacting you because the two officers showed up in the scene and they did nothing
to the girl no breathalyzer no investigation no citation nothing and they left with out even gave
me a report number so I have to call the next day to get the report number 212891335 and The
unit number for the police is F608609. we need a clear answer why the police officer didn't do
their job when they showed up to the scene. As we know when cops show up to the scene they
have to do their investigation it was so weird the cops showing without do anything also it was
weekend (Saturday night as we know cops alert on weekends because a lot of people driving
under the influence on the weekend. I already submitted complaint online and I am looking
forward to talk to someone about this. Police Report # 212891335 Police unit # F608609 EMS
case # 21-2891335 and you can call the EMS phone number 21148164 to get more details about
the Injury. We are waiting your response
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.
CTTP OF AUSTIN
OFFICE OF
POLICE OVERSIGHT
FOUNDED
Complaint Number: 2024-0089
Date of Complaint: 1/31/2024
Complainant's Name (if given):
Anonymous
Nature or complaint: Improper Police Procedure
Austin Police Officers Involved: Sevier AP8792, Collins AP9054, Burnsed AP6033
Unknown:
Complaint:
OF
The complainant alleges:
Good evening i want to submit a complaint against sgt Eric Burnsed and LT Jobes I want to
inform you that I had an accident on 10-16-2021 Saturday night, the girl who hit me from the
back of my truck was drunk and also she was on the phone I have her on the video, I am
contacting you because the two officers showed up in the scene and they did nothing to the girl
no breathalyzer no investigation no citation nothing and they left with out even gave me a report
number so I have to call the next day to get the report number 212891335 and
The unit number for the police is
F608609.
we need a clear answer why the police officer didn't do their job when they showed up to the
scene.
As we know when cops show up to the scene they have to do their investigation it was so weird
the cops showing without do anything also it was weekend (Saturday night) as we know cops
alert on weekends because a lot of people driving under the influence on the weekend.
I already submitted complaint online and I am looking forward to talk to someone about this.
NDED
Police Report # 212891335
Police unit # F608609
EMS case # 21-2891335 and you can call the EMS phone number 21148164 to get more details
about the Injury.
We are waiting your response
Office of Police Oversight Disposition: Supervisory Referral
The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American Disabilities Act.
Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request.